Articles

Justice, cont’d

In Uncategorized on June 15, 2011 by bleakhouses

I will have a series of posts updating this “issue.”

As I posted earlier, the hearing office demanded that I start the proceedings with a statement of my client’s defense and then gave me a hard time when I challenged him on due process grounds.

Here is the published procedure of the ECB for such hearings:

(d) Order of Hearing. The following shall be the order of all adjudicatory hearings, subject to modification by the hearing officer for good cause:
(1) Presentation and argument of motions preliminary to a hearing on the merits;
(2) Presentation of opening statements; if any
(3) Petitioner’s case in chief;
(4) Respondent’s case in chief;
(5) Petitioner’s case in rebuttal;
(6) Respondent’s case in rebuttal;
(7) Respondent’s closing argument;

 

Funny, no…how the rules don’t apply to them.  Of course, they could always argue that its “good cause” (see d above) to dispose of due process.  Wouldnt that be just like a Governmental agency to do just that!

 

Anyway, my review lead to a new idea, so something of value may come of all this frustration.   The ECB rules allow me to demand discovery prior to a hearing and present the penalty of preclusion in the event of non-response.  I am going to create a form discovery demand and serve it on every single violation that I get.

If you want to be part of my experiment in justice give me a call or email.

Thanks again for reading.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: